The defamation lawsuit by CVESD lawyers Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz continues--and it keeps getting more interesting

Judge Judith Hayes, CVESD lawyers and the US Constitution

See the June 21, 2012 court transcript. Amazing!

See July 27, 2012 hearing transcript in Stutz v. Larkins.

See all posts regarding Stutz v. Larkins.

Judge Judith Hayes

Judith Hayes, the judge in Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz' defamation lawsuit against this blogger, seems to have no interest at all in being guided by the August 5,2012 decision of the Court of Appeal in the case.

She was told that her Dec. 11, 2009 injunction was "exceedingly broad" and a violation of the Constitution. So what did she do? She simply took a narrower injunction and INTERPRETED in a way that functions exactly like the illegal injunction. Court transcripts show that she told me she wasn't going to give me permission to say "anything"!

On July 27, 2012, she struck my Answer that was filed in 2007.

I objected, as can be seen in the court transcript of the July 27 hearing.

CVESD lawyers Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz v. Maura Larkins trial February 2009

Stutz law firm asked the court on July 25, 2008 to delay the trial for their lawsuit against me for defamation.

One would think they'd be in a hurry to stop me if I'm truly defaming them.

Either my site isn't really hurting them, or Stutz law firm is tacitly admitting that what I say is true.


The November trial date selected by the court was changed to February 6, 2009.

The Stutz lawyer also said that a court-ordered settlement conference "would not be fruitful." The judge looked at him and said, "Well, then you'll just have to work it out yourselves."